0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

±¹³» ÀüÀÚ°£È£±â·Ï °³¹ß ¹× ½Ç¹«Àû¿ë ÇöȲ Á¶»ç

The Adoptions and Use of Electronic Nursing Records in Korean Hospitals: Findings of a Nationwide Survey

ÀÓ»ó°£È£¿¬±¸ 2013³â 19±Ç 3È£ p.345 ~ 356
KMID : 1004620130190030345
Á¶Àμ÷ ( Cho In-Sook ) - ÀÎÇÏ´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú

ÃÖ¿øÀÚ ( Choi Won-Ja ) - ¼­¿ïƯº°½Ãº¸¶ó¸Åº´¿ø °£È£ºÎ
ÃÖ¿ÏÈñ ( Choi Wan-Hee ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³º´¿ø °£È£ºÎ
±è¹Î°æ ( Kim Min-Kyeong ) - ÀÎÇÏ´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø

Abstract

Purpose: To provide clear estimates of the adoption and use of electronic nursing records (ENRs) with standard
terminology in Korea and identification of the scope and use as well as perceived or potential benefits of ENRs.

Methods: A survey was done of 733 hospitals at three levels: tertiary advanced hospitals, general hospitals, and
community hospitals. After performing a literature review a modified version of an existing survey tool was used
for 2 months in 2012. The collected information related to EHR functionality and coverage of nursing documentation
and nursing process, application of standard terminology, and perceived satisfaction and benefits
of ENRs.

Results: The response rate was 39.4% (289/733), and 202 hospitals (70.1%, 95% CI64.8~75.5%) of the
respondents had ENR systems (82.5% of tertiary hospitals, 66.7% of general hospitals, and 70.1% of community
hospitals). Out of these hospitals less than 10% had ENRs fully covering nursing documentation. The adoption
rate of standard terminology was 55%, and hospital satisfaction with ENRs was 70%. But personalized care was
identified as needing improvement in ENRs.

Conclusion: The ENR adoption rate was high but there are many
potential opportunities for improving ENR systems in terms of the data standardization and personalized care.
KeyWords
°£È£±â·Ï, ÀüÀÚÀǹ«±â·Ï½Ã½ºÅÛ, °£È£Á¤º¸, Ç¥ÁØ °£È£¿ë¾î, Ⱦ´ÜÀû ¿¬±¸
Nursing records, Medical records systems, Nursing informatics, Vocabulary, Cross-sectional survey
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)